User Profile

Nord's chapter 4, Motivation Drive and Wanting, strikes directly at the crux of my personal life challenges. The difference between wanting and pleasure. I want, and I have sometimes extreme drive, but I do not feel good about it, and am almost always disappointed. The countless times I have finished doing something and found myself pretending to be happy about it for the sake of others…

I enjoying these, specifically the account of drama beetween neighborhood cats which I just finished. A nice book I don't have to pay much attention to, but am glad to, when I do. A reminder to take delight where I can, not just think hard about everything and stay busy.

This is interesting to me because of the drug-induced anhedonia I experienced as a side effect of the ritalin I was forced to take for five years in my childhood. My experience of pleasure of all kinds never recovered to healthy levels, as is easy to rediscover at any time by comparing my experience with anyone who claims to enjoy anything that I also try to enjoy. (It is often difficult to describe not feeling pleasure because people are looking for an objective reason in the world, but it is easy to see that I don't reach the level of pleasure others express, even if I am finding some level of pleasure.)

Now I know the injury is not specific to a brain region.

Pertinent for our time, considering the "culture war," politics, nuclear family dynamics and all the other divisive factors of modern life.

The book I've been looking for all my life (really)

I began this book over a year ago, but today is a good day to take it up again.

As an anarchist systems thinker I have to say I don't appreciate how they clearly and emphatically imply that social systems are necessarily hierarchical. They draw a false dichotomy between community and systems. Systems are not diametrically opposed to communities. Systems are just repeating and interrelated behavior patterns plus the other resources that support those behavior patterns. Communities have systems, sometimes named, sometimes unrealized, sometimes designed, sometimes appreciated, and sometimes dysfunctional. Systems are a way to match complicated dynamics with declarative semantics so it can be acknowledged and manipulated, instantiated, moderated, or ended. Hierarchical organizations are just one type of a huge range of human systems.

I am committed to at least taking in everything published by #Graeber eventually

"Philosophy, though unable to to tell us with certainty what is the true answer to the doubts which it raises, is able to suggest many possibilities which enlarge our thoughts and free them from the tyranny of custom. Thus, while diminishing our feeling of certainty as to what things are, it greatly increases knowledge of what they may be; it removes the somewhat arrogant dogmatism of those who have never travelled into the region of liberating doubt, and it keeps alive our sense of wonder by showing familiar things in an unfamiliar aspect."

A lovely, lucid, short introduction to some key questions at the heart of philosophy.

In ch 6, Chen takes aim at the pathology mindset (and ingrained dysfunction) of the medical industry. Chen, then, moves on to eugenics. This is one of those chapters I want to be played on popular radio.

Excellent life story of an (apparently 🤷🏻) influential figure in ethnobotany. Everything Quave says checks out wrt the corruption and failures of the medical industry from my amateur bio-literate mind. Her life-long quest to shine light on the immense depth of plant chemistry for the good of humanity is inspiring, and I am grateful for her work and the context this book elucidates.