He's definitely making "just so" stories. Here's one about how he felt at 11-ish months old, 6 weeks after his parents split. How he thought his dad was just at work for those 6 weeks, before giving up. I'm sure his dad not being around was confusing or possibly even traumatic to 10 month old Perry, but no way in hell did he have any concept of "going to work" nor any actual memories of the time. Maybe he doesn't know he's making shit up, but he's making shit up.
Reviews and Comments
aka @kingrat@sfba.social. I'm following a lot of bookwyrm accounts, since that seems to be the only way to get reviews from larger servers to this small server. Also, I will like & boost a lot of reviews that come across my feed. I will follow most bookwyrm accounts back if they review & comment. Social reading should be social.
This link opens in a pop-up window
Phil in SF commented on Friends, Lovers, and the Big Terrible Thing by Matthew Perry
Phil in SF commented on Friends, Lovers, and the Big Terrible Thing by Matthew Perry
I'm early in the audiobook, but I'm beginning to get a sense that Perry is going to fill this book with a bunch of self-diagnosed pop psychology. "Not having a parent on that flight is one of many things that led to a lifelong feeling of abandonment." " if I drop my game, my Chandler, and show you who I really am you might notice me. but worse you might notice me and leave me, and I can't have that. I won't survive that... so I will leave you first." I heard this kind of BS all over alcoholism recovery spaces and it's usually bullshit. it's meant to make one's brokenness a sympathetic kind, rather than an asshole kind.
Phil in SF reviewed Beacon 23 by Hugh Howey
Shell shock comes for a space war soldier
2 stars
Content warning minor spoilers
Plagued by feelings of guilt at being the only survivor of a skirmish in a war with aliens, "Digger" uses his hero status to get a posting to a beacon at the edge of Sector 8. The beacons are somewhat like lighthouses, but with signals that warn faster-than-light ships to avoid asteroids. One person staffs a beacon alone for 2 years at a time. Digger wants to be alone.
And so in what was originally a series of short stories, we witness Digger as the beacon fails at the wrong time, as he rescues what he thinks is alien life in the debris of a destroyed ship and starts talking to a rock, as he deals with bounty hunters, and as NASA puts another beacon nearby and Digger falls in love with the woman tuning it even though she talks like a psychologist.
The stories are slow and are driven by Digger's pedestrian inner monologue. Every other character is one-dimensional. Claire, the woman in the other beacon, has no personality but serves as the woman who heals Digger's war-broken psyche. Because the embrace of a woman is what every man needs.
The setup is intriguing enough that I suspect the Apple+ series made from the stories is a lot more interesting than this was.
Phil in SF started reading Lake of Darkness by Adam Roberts
Phil in SF reviewed Billy Boyle by James R. Benn (A Billy Boyle WWII Mystery, #1)
I liked it despite its flaws
4 stars
Billy Boyle is a young Boston cop whose family pulls strings with their Congressman and "Uncle Ike" (Eisenhower) to get a cushy officer position rather than an infantry position in WW2. Ike wants to use him as a special investigator, and the first case is to root out a man who is part of the Norwegian government in exile and also a Nazi spy. While on the grounds of Beardsley Hall, where the Norwegian government-in-exile is located, one of two men competing for King Haakon's ear appears to be murdered. Boyle's search for the spy is now also a search for a murderer.
I found the story enjoyable, especially the early parts of the book where Boyle lays out how he's not really a top-notch detective. Rather he's barely made the rank when he was inducted. And the initial investigation stuff is great too, as it involves things like following …
Billy Boyle is a young Boston cop whose family pulls strings with their Congressman and "Uncle Ike" (Eisenhower) to get a cushy officer position rather than an infantry position in WW2. Ike wants to use him as a special investigator, and the first case is to root out a man who is part of the Norwegian government in exile and also a Nazi spy. While on the grounds of Beardsley Hall, where the Norwegian government-in-exile is located, one of two men competing for King Haakon's ear appears to be murdered. Boyle's search for the spy is now also a search for a murderer.
I found the story enjoyable, especially the early parts of the book where Boyle lays out how he's not really a top-notch detective. Rather he's barely made the rank when he was inducted. And the initial investigation stuff is great too, as it involves things like following money, interviewing staff, and searching rooms. Later in the story the investigation turns more to speculative means, and I don't enjoy that as much. However, the story throughout also includes a lot of the developing friendship between Boyle, British Second Officer Daphne Seaton, and Polish officer-in-exile Piotr "Kaz" Kazimierz. That made up for the investigation veering into methods I dislike in my fiction.
Lastly, the ending is pretty unbelievable, and doesn't hold together on its own terms. I didn't really mind that much, but if you like your mysteries to make sense all the way to the end, this is not the book for you.
Phil in SF commented on Beacon 23 by Hugh Howey
Phil in SF commented on Billy Boyle by James R. Benn (A Billy Boyle WWII Mystery, #1)
Phil in SF reviewed The Long Game by Ann Leckie (The Far Reaches, #4)
very talky
3 stars
humans colonize a planet with tentacle & beak having aliens that have a low level of intelligence. one of them talks their human liaison into genetically altering them to live longer. they're playing the long game. it's very talky
Phil in SF reviewed Dead Connection by Alafair Burke (Ellie Hatcher, #1)
Phil in SF commented on Combee by Edda L. Fields-Black
And with the addition of this book, I've now completed the Pulitzer Price for History list on SFBA.club (sfba.club/list/115/s/pulitzer-prize-for-history). If you follow me, there should be a version of the list on your server. I've added descriptions and high quality covers on SFBA.club; what shows up on other servers may be a crapshoot.
Phil in SF started reading Dead Connection by Alafair Burke (Ellie Hatcher, #1)
I've also had Alafair Burke's 212 on my TBR pile for a while, but it's the 3rd book in the Ellie Hatcher series. So I went and got the 1st book in the series on Libby because I hate starting series after the first book.
Phil in SF reviewed Manifold: Time by Stephen Baxter (Manifold, #1)
Do you like potheads going on about mathematics?
2 stars
Reid Malenfant has a plan to go to the stars, and it's very Musk-like even before Musk was a thing. OK fine. Most of the first 12% of this book (which is where I pressed the eject button) is taken up by a sophist discussion of the chances of human survival. So here's the argument: either human population grows exponentially/polynomially, it levels off at a sustainable level, or it crashes. Following so far? The fact that you are alive means that the most likely outcome is the third. Here's the logic: In the first two scenarios, the vast majority of all humans will live in the future. So if you picked someone (you) randomly, you'd most likely be in the far future! Because you are here, the most likely outcome is that humans die off soon. In the story, within 240 years at the most.
First of all, this is …
Reid Malenfant has a plan to go to the stars, and it's very Musk-like even before Musk was a thing. OK fine. Most of the first 12% of this book (which is where I pressed the eject button) is taken up by a sophist discussion of the chances of human survival. So here's the argument: either human population grows exponentially/polynomially, it levels off at a sustainable level, or it crashes. Following so far? The fact that you are alive means that the most likely outcome is the third. Here's the logic: In the first two scenarios, the vast majority of all humans will live in the future. So if you picked someone (you) randomly, you'd most likely be in the far future! Because you are here, the most likely outcome is that humans die off soon. In the story, within 240 years at the most.
First of all, this is not a plot. Or characters. Or poetic language. Or description. Or ... any of a hundred other things that would be interesting. This is someone smoking too much pot and explaining their pot-infused philosophy to you. If an author wants to set up a coming apocalypse there's so many better ways to do it than this "clever" thought experiment.
Second of all, this therefore means that if humanity does survive into the far future, they have sent a message back in time to us with instructions on how to survive. That whole sophistry just sets up Reid Malenfant's purpose to be to look for the message from the future. This whole first part of the book is just to set that up. That makes no sense and I had to read it all for that reason? Give me a break!
At this point I searched for reviews of the book to see if anyone said the later parts of the book are worth it. And the top review of Manifold: Time that Google referred me to is one from Kirkus. It's fairly spoilery, so if the above BS is actually intriguing to you, don't click the review. Anyway, I've no interest in reading the schmoz that's described there.
DNF at 12%.